When Systems Fail: The Critical Principle of “Fail Securely”

brown wooden framed glass window
Photo by Mark Olsen on Unsplash

In the world of software engineering, we often focus on building things that work. But true resilience lies in designing systems that know how to fail safely. The internet is built on the assumption that components will inevitably break—databases will go offline, networks will drop packets, and servers will crash.

For a security architect, the question is not if your system will fail, but how it will fail. The answer must be: it must Fail Securely.

What is the “Fail Securely” Principle?

The principle of “Fail Securely” (or Fail Closed) dictates that in the event of an unexpected error, component failure, or system malfunction, the system should default to the most secure, restrictive state possible.

This usually means prioritizing Confidentiality and Integrity over Availability.

The Two Modes of Failure

To understand Fail Securely, you must contrast it with the dangerous alternative:

  1. Fail Open (Insecure): The system defaults to allowing maximum access or functionality. If the security mechanism fails (e.g., the firewall dies, or the authentication service crashes), the system assumes everything is fine and lets everyone in. This maximizes availability but completely eliminates security.
  2. Fail Securely (Fail Closed): The system defaults to blocking all access or functionality until the security mechanism is restored and can verify the legitimacy of the request. This sacrifices availability during the failure but guarantees that unauthorized access cannot occur.

The Rule: If a security check cannot be performed successfully, the action being requested must be denied.

Application Example: The Authentication Database Disconnect

Consider a modern web application with a secure login endpoint that relies on a central database to verify user credentials and roles.

Scenario: The Database Goes Offline

The application server loses its connection to the database where all user passwords and permissions are stored.

Security Principle Action Taken by the System Outcome
Fail Open (Insecure) The server can’t look up the user’s credentials, so it assumes the database must be validating them successfully, or it grants temporary default access. Risk: The attacker gains full access to the system simply by triggering a database failure or network partition. \textbf{Result: Data Breach.}
Fail Securely (Robust) The server receives an exception when trying to query the database. Since the authentication check cannot be performed, the login request is explicitly denied with an error message. Risk: Legitimate users cannot log in (system unavailable). \textbf{Result: Security maintained.}

In the Fail Securely application, the application prefers to inconvenience the user rather than compromise the integrity or confidentiality of its data. Once the database connection is restored, authentication resumes seamlessly.

Why This Principle is Critical for Modern Systems

1. Zero Trust Compliance

The “Fail Securely” principle is a cornerstone of Zero Trust architecture. If a service cannot verify the identity, context, or integrity of a request (i.e., it can’t trust it), the default action is always Deny.

2. Protecting Sensitive Data

In complex systems involving Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), losing the authorization component is catastrophic. If the system cannot determine if a user is an

Admin

or a

Guest

, falling back to

Admin

privileges (Fail Open) would expose all sensitive data. Failing securely ensures the user gets zero access until their role is confirmed.

3. Mitigating Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks

While a DoS aims to reduce availability, a sophisticated attacker might attempt to crash a security service (like a firewall or authorization microservice) and then rely on the system to “Fail Open” to gain unauthorized entry. Designing the system to Fail Securely removes this attack vector entirely.

By embedding the Fail Securely mindset into every component—from input validation routines to network configuration—we build software that is inherently more resilient and trustworthy, even when the inevitable chaos of system failure occurs.

If you found an error, highlight it and press Shift + Enter or click here to inform us.


Discover more from Psyops Prime

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 When Systems Fail: The Critical Principle of “Fail Securely” by Psyops Prime is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Leave a Reply